Reply to Jones

Reply to Christopher M . Jones and Michael Niederweis

Proprioception versus motor outflow in timing: a reply to Jones.

Jones' point that the motor outflow hypothesis should be considered a rival to the proprioceptive feedback interpretation of the motor response timing data reviewed by Schmidt has potential merit. However, with no data ruling in favor of motor outflow over proprioceptive feedback for timing, and with other peripheral feedback channels (e.g., vision) known to be mechanisms for timing, the propri...

The Authors’ Reply

The Authors’ Reply

Reply to the Letter to the Editor Reply to

We thank Dr Schachner for his interest and comments on our recent experimental findings [1]. The first facet of our study was that although initially (at 1 month), neointima formation in vein grafts was inhibited by perivenous application of fibrin glue at the time of implantation, at 4 months neointimal formation was not significantly different from controls [1]. Dr Schachner has implied that ...